Business repot patrick stevedores dispute

To get a handle on all things waterfront, Crikey spoke with workplace relations expert Professor Andrew Stewart from the University of Adelaide. How long could this latest dispute last? I would expect that matters would come to a head fairly quickly. I think either one side or the other will make a significant concession soon where they will both head back to the bargaining table and a renewed negotiation phase will begin.

Business repot patrick stevedores dispute

This however does not include the revenue on car importations. Data was collected throughout by the Productivity Commissioncomparing international container stevedoring performance for the same ships and trades.

Australian waterfront dispute - Wikipedia

The data indicated that Australia charged generally higher, productivity was lower and services were less reliable than overseas. With the exception of bulk grain loading, other areas of traditional stevedoring also performed relatively poorly. It also found that marine service and port infrastructure charges were, in total, two to three times greater than at overseas ports — noting that only some of this reflects cost-recovery pricing in Australia.

Overall, the international benchmarking revealed significant scope for improvement in Australia's performance. Industrial relations legislation[ edit ] The Howard government, before being elected inhad promised significant industrial relations reform.

The stated aim of this Business repot patrick stevedores dispute was to foster individual choice in workplace bargaining by reducing the powers of external organisations, particularly trade unions, to intervene. In addition, the legislation reduced powers of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission to arbitrate disputes.

The Act also introduced individual statutory employment contracts. The watering down of collective bargaining provisions was a source of objection from many workers and unions.

Transcript

Beginnings of the dispute[ edit ] Australian waterfront productivity had been an issue of concern since the s. Patrick Corporation sought to improve productivity by creating redundancies and reducing overtime entitlements for its permanent employees, as well as hiring more employees on a casual basis.

Apr 25,  · Engineered to Slide Drift Hilux (Nigel Petrie) at the V 4 & Rotary North Island Jamboree - Duration: Premier Events TV , views. Employment Relations – Patrick Stevedores waterfront dispute () In this report, an analysis of employment relations is looked at in regard to the Patrick Stevedores Dispute of This dispute was a massive class battle that took place between Patrick Stevedores . The ITF has weighed into the Patrick's dispute. Please read ITF General Secretary Steve Cotton's statement below. International Transport Workers’ Federation General Secretary Steve Cotton has written to the management of Patrick Stevedores urging them to negotiate in good faith with their workforce amid the ongoing dispute at Port Botany.

The Maritime Union of Australia was born from this background and retained a heavy union presence on the waterside. There had been numerous allegations concerning union members and officials in relation to illegal activity, fraud, grafting and bully tactics.

At the time, it was mandatory that prospective employee had to be a card-carrying member of the MUA. The Howard Government sought to encourage a non-union workforce to compete against the MUA and made new legislative changes to bring this about.

After the legislative introduction of Australian Workplace Agreementsa number of stevedoring operators toyed with bringing individual contract workers into their workforces, but abandoned their plans in the face of strident union opposition and activism.

This led to use of terms like 'industrial mercenaries ' in political and media circles. Fynwest planned to send these recruits to Dubai in the United Arab Emirateswhere international standard training could be provided. The newly trained stevedores would then take part in an Australian non-union dock workers training program.

Business repot patrick stevedores dispute

The MUA was "tipped off" about the planned Fynwest operation and took the matter to the media who met the departing Fynwest employees as they boarded a flight to Dubai and questioned their "tourist" status.

Intense criticism and the threat of international industrial retaliation forced the Dubai Government to cancel visas for the Fynwest company employees.

The lockout[ edit ] Picket line at Swanston Dock, Melbourne In SeptemberPatrick implemented a restructure whereby the functions of employing its unionised workforce and owning its stevedoring business were divided into different companies.

Business repot patrick stevedores dispute

The stevedoring businesses and assets previously held by the employer entities were transferred to other companies within the Patricks Group. In addition, the employer entities entered into various labour supply agreements with the owner entities to supply Patricks with labour.

As a consequence, the labour supply agreements became the major asset of the employer entities. Significantly, the labour supply agreements were terminable by the owner entities without notice in circumstances of industrial action. In late and earlyPatrick's employees engaged in industrial action, most notably at Melbourne's No 5 Webb Dock.

On 8 AprilPatrick's management dismissed all of its employees; liquidated its assets, becoming technically insolvent ; and imposed a lockout at most ports in which it operated. Minister for Workplace RelationsPeter Reith read from a prepared brief, stating that the government fully supported Patrick in their action.

Litigation[ edit ] The case went before the Federal Court with Justice North finding in favour of the union. He found that the company had deliberately restructured their corporate structure with the sole intent to dismiss their unionised workers.

The company appealed to the High Court of Australia with the government's support. The agreement specified a near-halving of the permanent workforce through voluntary redundancies, the casualisation and contracting out of some jobs, smaller work crews, longer regular hours, company control over rostering, and productivity bonuses for faster loading.

While the union retained the ability to represent maritime workers, the company achieved significant changes to work practices as it desired.The ITF has weighed into the Patrick's dispute.

Re: The 1998 Patrick Stevedores Waterfront Dispute

Please read ITF General Secretary Steve Cotton's statement below. International Transport Workers’ Federation General Secretary Steve Cotton has written to the management of Patrick Stevedores urging them to negotiate in good faith with their workforce amid the ongoing dispute at Port Botany.

This dispute was a massive class battle that took place between Patrick Stevedores and the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA). It was one of Australia’s biggest, ever industrial conflicts of the ’s challenging the industrial unions of the time by the standing Australian Government.

Apr 25,  · Engineered to Slide Drift Hilux (Nigel Petrie) at the V 4 & Rotary North Island Jamboree - Duration: Premier Events TV , views. Outline of the Waterfront Dispute.

Outline of the Waterfront Dispute. Skip to navigation; Skip to content; and thus small and large business suffers from the dispute. Finally, the public is now privy to offers and negotiations between Patrick, the MUA, the Government, PCS and the administrators of the four Patrick labour companies which.

On the night of 7 April , Patrick Stevedores boss Chris Corrigan sacked his entire workforce and started one of the first serious challenges by a corporation to trade union power in Australia.

Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN ) v Patrick was carrying on a business within the transport industry which conducted stevedoring operations, including for containerised cargo.

Enforceable Undertaking is .

Outline of the Waterfront Dispute – Parliament of Australia